“There is no ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any of the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din observed firstly the deceased and after some distance they observed the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not indicate that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. These types of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of previous found.
Some sites could specialize in specific areas of law, although others offer a broader database. Factors to take into account when choosing a website include the comprehensiveness with the database, the ease of navigation, and also the availability of advanced search options.
A survey of PACER people, conducted in 2021, measured user satisfaction and discovered areas for improvement with PACER services. The Administrative Office from the U.S. Courts is using the survey results To judge and prioritize potential changes to PACER services and features.
competent authority and when any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)
record in the department there is not any record offered whatsoever regarding promotion of your petitioner(Promotion)
This Court could interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the summary or finding attained with the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. When the conclusion or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court might here interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mould the relief to really make it correct for the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or even the nature of punishment. Over the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified via the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
Petitioner acquiring been declared an absconder in this case for over a single in addition to a 50 % year generates the apprehension that the petitioner could avoid standing trial and as a result delay the prosecution in the case. The material on record makes the case with the petitioner falls under two exceptions to your rule of grant of bail as mentioned over.
already been released from the jail completion of his term . Appeal dismissed on merits (Murder Trial)
department concerned shall deliver the complete set of ACRs on the concerned officer to DPC nicely in advance cases for promotin(Promotion)
Knowledge of the accused is a matter to get inferred from the circumstances, for it being a state of mind, is quite challenging to become proved otherwise.”
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
share or interest of the co-owner in immovable property can also sold to another co-owner/co-sharer or perhaps to an stranger and section 44(Transfer of Property Act 1882)
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case law previously rendered on similar cases.